vineri, 18 februarie 2011

Caffeinated Thoughts

Caffeinated Thoughts


A Conversation About Home Schooling

Posted: 17 Feb 2011 11:24 PM PST


Sixteen years of my life, thus far, have been dedicated to the education of my children.  I have home schooled all four and can proudly say, that it continues to pay in eternal dividends.  My first graduate is now a junior at Biola University studying journalism and effectively navigating the world of higher education.  My younger three are in high school and junior high; they get to expand their home schooling horizons through the Biola STAR Academics program, where they take core classes, while enjoying the benefit found only in home schooling.  It has been a road less traveled and many times exhausting, but it has been worth all the late night preparations of essays and tears of “just not getting it” when faced with an algebraic equation.  The dividends that are gained through the diligent side by side work with my children, not just in their academic life, but as a family are priceless and something that could not be recreated if an institution had my children for 8 to 10 hours a day.  It is the best school choice we as a family ever made.

My co-worker at STAR Academics and I were discussing the following parent-teacher conference film in light of education in general. Having home schooled for so long and having been actively involved with the teaching of other home schooled students, I have found that most home schooling families have counted the cost of sending their children to the local assembly line of education and have made the choice to swim against the status quo. Those who come from the public schools, are usually shocked by the vigorous program we offer two days a week at STAR Academics, and the time and dedication that is demanded of the parents themselves. There is also the surprise that the “A” easily gained at the public school may not be as easily achieved in our home schooling program. The kinds of conversations that many times take place are, “How come Jimmy is not excelling like he was at his old high school? Why is he only getting a “B-”, when he used to get all “A”s in his A.P. classes?” To this type of question, my site administrator explains that, colleges will ultimately look at the scores of SAT or ACT tests as these compare apples to apples, and that different grading standards of the various schools in the valley, be it private, public or home schooling will be measured in that standardized test.

She gave the example of a school that takes remedial students, just trying to prepare them for the California High School Exit Exam, who end up getting “A”s as seniors while passing an eighth grade level math course. Their GPA may look good, but the comparison of strenuous academic criteria and standards found at the neighboring Christian school makes the “A” student from the remdial school not even compare to a “B” student at the private school. Therefore a standardized test for universities to weigh the student’s academic aptitude is necessary.

The goal of most home schooling families I have been privileged to work with goes deeper than just academics and involves the educating and nurturing of the whole child: body, soul and spirit. Because the parent is the teacher, he or she recognizes the areas of strength and weakness in the individual student and can make adjustments to meet those needs. Remaining diligent to the call, finding outside help when needed and realizing that the goal should be to instill a love of learning, will help when the daily grind gets rough.

Whether one chooses Private, Charter, Public or Home Schooling for their children, ultimately the training of the child rests solely on the parents and their involvement in the process. One can not enter a parent teacher conference and place all the blame on the teacher, as the closest teacher a child will ever have is the parent. Too many times, the following video, is the scene in a parent teacher conference. Watch and learn how not to be like this mother portrayed in this telling scenario.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=sr5kWOdkHYA

Share and Enjoy:PrintemailAdd to favoritesDiggFacebookGoogle BookmarksFriendFeedStumbleUponTwitterRedditYahoo! BuzzPosterousdel.icio.usLinkedInTumblrTechnorati

Wisconsin Senate Democrats Flee to Stop Vote to End Public Employee Collective Bargaining

Posted: 17 Feb 2011 10:30 PM PST


imageNew Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker has the votes to end collective bargaining power for public employees.  I applaud that effort.  I believe that public employee unions are anathema to taxpayers, and while some title the bill "anti-union" I consider this move to be pro-taxpayer.  What I find ironic is that teachers who went to Madison in protest say that this bill will keep kids out of school actually caused schools in Madison to cancel classes.

Can they see the irony?  Virtually nothing that a teachers' union does is for the kids. Perhaps they really are the root of all evil in education

Since Democrats don't have the votes to defeat this measure, they're actually trying to stop the vote by running away.  Yes, 14 Senators fled the state which in effect prevents a vote since Wisconsin law requires at least one person from the other party to vote on the measure.  They had to run to Illinois so Wisconsin State Troopers couldn't force them to return.

Can you imagine if these were Republican legislators?  They are hijacking a constitutional process because they got their clocks cleaned in November and don't have the votes to stop it.  They are derelict in their duties, in Iowa we've had to endure years of liberal policies get crammed down our throats and not once would I have ever suggested or supported that Republican legislators leave town.  This is just insane.

President Barack Obama couldn't keep himself from weighing in on another state issue, and he sides with the unions against the taxpayers.  Here, yet again, is another example of President Obama being on the opposite side of the people.  Republicans in Wisconsin were voted into power to reign in spending and bring fiscal sanity back to Madison.  So yes there are huge protests this is the type of action the voters expected.  Taxpayers need to be heard.

Share and Enjoy:PrintemailAdd to favoritesDiggFacebookGoogle BookmarksFriendFeedStumbleUponTwitterRedditYahoo! BuzzPosterousdel.icio.usLinkedInTumblrTechnorati

Chivalry Is Not Dead, At Least on the Wrestling Mat

Posted: 17 Feb 2011 08:15 PM PST


imageI have tremendous respect for Joel Northup, a sophomore homeschooled student who wrestles for Linn-Mar High School in Marion, IA.  Joel went 25-4 this year, and qualified for the Iowa State Wrestling Tournament in the 112 lbs. weight class.  Two girls also qualified for the tournament, the first time in state history, and Joel was supposed to wrestle Cassy Herkelman, a freshman at Cedar Falls High School who qualified after going 20-13 this year.

This morning in the first round Northup refused and chose to default instead.  He cited religious reasons and the fact that he was raised that this is not "how you treat a girl."  He released a statement through his school later this afternoon:

I have a tremendous amount of respect for Cassy and Megan (another girl from Ottumwa, IA who qualified) and their accomplishments.

However, wrestling is a combat sport and it can get violent at times.  As a matter of conscience and my faith I do not believe that it is appropriate for a boy to engage a girl in this manner. It is unfortunate that I have been placed in a situation not seen in most other high school sports in Iowa.

Some have said this decision was made because he was afraid he'd lose to a girl.  The kid was a favorite to win the tournament, so no that isn't it.  He stood by his principles even when it cost him, and that is something we all should admire whether or not you agree with his decision.

I happen to agree.  Having wrestled myself, I understand the sport well enough along with different moves, etc. to know that there are positions you can be placed in that would be inappropriate.  There are many sports where girls and boys can compete, but because of the physical contact involved I don't believe wrestling should be one of them.  Joel wanted to avoid the very appearance of impropriety.

More importantly I think it is a sad commentary about our culture when people don't understand why he made this decision.  I do.  My son wrestled for a couple of years until he decided he wasn't interested.  We were confronted with the possibility that he may eventually have to wrestle a girl (something I never even had to think about when I wrestled).  My wife and I (and my son) believe that was inappropriate, and it went against everything we had taught him about how he should treat women.

We've raised him to treat his mom and sisters with gentleness and respect.  We've taught to never, ever use physical force against a girl (unless there is a legitimate need for real self-defense with an older woman).  He does things like *gasp* opening the door for his mother and sisters.  We want to raise a modern-day knight.  I assume it is the same with the Northups, as it is with many Christians within (and without) the homeschool community.

So Joel was to abandon that in order to win a wrestling match?

Joel you made us proud.  In the spirit of Eric Liddell you stood for what you believe.  Hold your head high.  Thank God chivalry isn't dead, at least on the wrestling mat at Wells Fargo Arena in Des Moines, IA today.

Share and Enjoy:PrintemailAdd to favoritesDiggFacebookGoogle BookmarksFriendFeedStumbleUponTwitterRedditYahoo! BuzzPosterousdel.icio.usLinkedInTumblrTechnorati

Waiting for Superman: Teachers’ Unions Are The Root of All Evil (in Education)

Posted: 17 Feb 2011 05:00 PM PST


image

I stopped by Redbox last night and saw that Waiting for Superman was available.  Since I'm interested in education and I knew this documentary dealt with education reform, and since the other choices I found wanting I rented it.

My summary of the documentary.

  1. Education saves – hence kids are "waiting for Superman."
  2. Public education in the United States stinks, big time.
  3. Teacher's unions are largely to blame (along with "the blob" – tangled mess of local, state. and federal regulations/benchmarks).
  4. Kids today will be not equipped educationally to do tomorrow's jobs. (Bill Gates testified before Congress stating as much).
  5. Charter schools are the answer.
  6. There are too few charter schools with too few openings, and many have their educational fate determined by a lottery that takes place to see if they get in.
  7. So kids are still waiting for Superman.

It should go without saying that Jesus saves, not education.  Education can help, but without a moral foundation for it be laid upon; it can be for naught.  Public education is in trouble.  Kids are advancing to the next grade without the proficiency that they should have at that level.  They noted that in California, the public university system is set up to take the top third of high school graduates, but yet they have to do remedial work for 50-60% of incoming freshman before they are ready to take college level classes.  That's a travesty.  Our student are falling behind in reading, math and science proficiency compared to other nations, but yet we lead the world in student confidence.

Wow, that's encouraging.  This documentary mainly laid the blame at the feet of teacher's unions.  I certainly think they are culpable when you consider their opposition to merit-based pay, their involvement in making it difficult to fire horrible teachers, and backing tenure in some states.  The very idea of tenure which was focused in this documentary is incredible to me… why should anyone expect to have their jobs for life?  In colleges and universities there has been a rigorous process for this after professors have been teaching for years, not so in K-12.  Teacher's unions are an anathema when it comes to educational reform.

Poor teacher performance and public school systems inability to address the problem is certainly one major factor, but it is not the only one.  No one mentioned all that schools are doing beyond teaching the basics?  A poor curriculum also needs to be addressed when from my point of view it seems like there has been more indoctrination than education going on with public schools in terms of promoting multiculturalism and watering down civics education.

Also parents are complicit as well.  I appreciated some of the parents that were highlighted who did take responsibility for their children's education.  I believe that attitude is lacking in much of society however.  There is a prevailing attitude that it is the "state's job to educate my child."  Too many people have bought the meme that it is natural and right to hand our children over to the state at age 5 or 6 (or younger!).  No, as parents it is our job to educate our children and public schools are just one tool to do that.  That is why drives me nuts with the whole debate in Iowa regarding universal pre-school.  Who should be teaching kids their ABCs and preparing them for school?  Parents.

Whether you send your kids to public school, private school or you home school, you must be involved in education of your child and engaged.  So parents can't just shift the blame.  If you're child's educational environment is not suitable, then it is on the parent to change it.  Explore options, make sacrifices if necessary, and it seemed like the parents highlighted in the documentary tried to do this, but unfortunately many don't.

Which leads me to my ultimate problem with this documentary.  While there are some excellent charter schools out there, the documentary shared only one in five are truly successful.  It seemed by watching Waiting for Superman that the only option were public school or a public charter school, and if your child couldn't get into a charter school then they were toast.  Well, certainly for some families, especially lower income ones, choices are limited.  I'm curious why not talk about private school options?  Why not discuss school vouchers (or better yet tax credits)?  The documentary looked at D.C., but didn't even bring up the voucher program there (which I believe was still running when the documentary was made).  In Iowa we allow for a personal tax credit and then up to 65% of a donation made to a school tuition organization in Iowa can be counted toward their taxes.  This helped bolster tuition assistance to private schools.  Then there is the home school option.  There are many families who can't afford private school, but decide to home school instead.  What can be done to encourage families who make that sacrifice.  In Iowa there isn't even a tax credit for home educators to claim for their curriculum purchases, that is appalling.  There are also growing opportunities for online education why not discuss that?

So while Waiting for Superman was excellent in pointing out the problems inherent with public schools in general, and teacher's unions in particular if offered little for the way forward.  Options can't begin and end with charter schools.

Share and Enjoy:PrintemailAdd to favoritesDiggFacebookGoogle BookmarksFriendFeedStumbleUponTwitterRedditYahoo! BuzzPosterousdel.icio.usLinkedInTumblrTechnorati

Mike Pence on House Floor: “Deny Any and All Funding to Planned Parenthood”

Posted: 17 Feb 2011 04:15 PM PST


From a speech that Congressman Mike Pence (R-IN) gave tonight on floor of the House of Representatives in support of his amendment that will end federal funding of Planned Parenthood.

I believe that ending an innocent human life is morally wrong.

I also believe it is morally wrong to take the taxpayer dollars of millions of pro-life Americans and use them to fund organizations that provide and promote abortion-like Planned Parenthood of America.

The headlines and years of investigations speak for themselves.

In 2002, Planned Parenthood was found civilly liable in Arizona for failure to report statutory rape.

In 2008 it violated reporting laws in Indiana and California.

In 2009 it instructed a girl in Tennessee to lie about her age so she could get an abortion without her parents’ knowledge.

Recently in California, Washington, New Jersey, and New York, Planned Parenthood clinics have been accused of fraudulent accounting or overbilling practices.

And last week, undercover videos showed Planned Parenthood employees apparently willing to aid human sex traffickers by coaching them on how to falsify documents and secure secret abortions for their underage prostitutes.

As the father of two teenage daughters, there are not words strong enough to portray my contempt of this pattern of apparent fraud and abuse by Planned Parenthood.

And the American people deserve to know, Planned Parenthood is not only the largest abortion provider in America. It is also the largest recipient of taxpayer funding under Title X.

According to their latest annual report, Planned Parenthood received more than $363 million in taxpayer dollars, while also boasting of performing an unprecedented 324,008 abortions.

The Pence Amendment would deny any and all federal funding to Planned Parenthood Federation of America and its affiliates for the rest of this fiscal year.

Let me be clear, my amendment would not cut funding for health services. It would simply block those funds already in the bill from subsidizing America’s largest abortion provider.

Now, I am aware that Title X family planning funds are eliminated in this bill, but eliminating Title X funding has never been my goal. I support the important work of Title X clinics across the country that provide breast cancer screenings, HIV testing, counseling, and other valuable family planning services.

The reality is that Planned Parenthood receives hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars from federal funding sources other than Title X. Of the $363 million they received last year, according to the GAO, only $53 million of that was from Title X.

My focus has and will remain on denying taxpayer dollars to Planned Parenthood or any organization that provides or promotes abortion as a means of birth control.

Some consider the Pence Amendment a ‘war on Planned Parenthood,’ but this is not about Planned Parenthood’s right to be in the abortion business. Sadly, abortion on demand is legal in America. This debate is about who pays for it.

Only in Washington, D.C. are you declaring war on an organization by simply refusing to pay for it with taxpayer dollars.

Nobody is saying that Planned Parenthood can’t be the leading advocate of abortion on demand in America…but why do I have to pay for it?

Nobody is saying that Planned Parenthood cannot continue to be the largest abortion provider in America, but why do millions of pro-life taxpayers have to pay for it?

I long for the day that Roe v. Wade is sent to the ash heap of history, when we move past the broken hearts and broken lives of the past 38 years, but as this debate rages on…let us at least respect the overwhelming consensus of the American people and end taxpayer support for abortion providers once and for all.

This is the moment. Now is the time. Support the Pence Amendment. I urge my colleagues to take a stand for taxpayers, take a stand against a pattern of corruption, and take a stand for young women in crisis pregnancies who deserve access to unbiased and compassionate health services. Let’s end taxpayer support of Planned Parenthood.

Share and Enjoy:PrintemailAdd to favoritesDiggFacebookGoogle BookmarksFriendFeedStumbleUponTwitterRedditYahoo! BuzzPosterousdel.icio.usLinkedInTumblrTechnorati

Keep Duncan Out of State Education

Posted: 17 Feb 2011 01:45 PM PST


politicoHere is an op/ed at Politico co-authored by Joe Mack, who is the director of American Principles Project's Preserve Innocence initiative in South Carolina, and our editor, Shane Vander Hart, who is the communications director for the Preserve Innocence Initiative.  Here is an excerpt:

So soon after the elections, will we now witness the agony of betrayal?

Something special happened in November. Americans affirmed the idea that the people were the fountain of government authority.

The federal government's foremost transgression over the last half-century has been encroachment on powers "reserved to the States respectively, or to the people." Among the most important is the authority over education. By tradition, Americans have viewed that power as one of local control – subject to the scrutiny of engaged parents.

The progressive movement has been working to change that. It did so initially through creeping centralization, which slowly took authority and prominence from parents. It then delivered devastating blows to local control through vigorous expansion of the federal role.

The most recent of these was brought to us by Arne Duncan, the education secretary. He embedded the $4.35 billion Race to the Top program in the infamous "stimulus" bill.

Through a carrot-and-stick scheme, that program foisted the common core standards on the cash-starved states. Only Gov. Sarah Palin of Alaska and Gov. Rick Perry of Texas —later joined by Gov. Bob McDonnell of Virginia—had the courage to outright reject the standards and the funds tied to it.

Read more.

Share and Enjoy:PrintemailAdd to favoritesDiggFacebookGoogle BookmarksFriendFeedStumbleUponTwitterRedditYahoo! BuzzPosterousdel.icio.usLinkedInTumblrTechnorati

Niciun comentariu:

Trimiteți un comentariu