marți, 22 mai 2012

Caffeinated Thoughts

Caffeinated Thoughts


President Obama Can Return President Clinton’s Title

Posted: 22 May 2012 04:30 AM PDT

Barack-Obama-gay-Newsweek-coverThanks to Newsweek, the title "first black president" can now be returned to President Clinton. It was Clinton's alone until Senator Obama became President Obama and now that Newsweek has declared him to be the first gay president he no longer needs the "first black president" title.

For those of you who are now a bit confused let me explain. In a 1998 article for New Yorker American novelist, editor, and professor Toni Morrison declared President Clinton to be "our first black President…blacker than any actual black person who could ever be elected in our children's lifetime." That phrase was picked by many Clinton supporters and repeated until even the Congressional Black Caucus acknowledged it to be true. On September 29th, 2001, Texas Democrat Rep. Eddie Bernice Johnson who was then serving as the chair of the Caucus said that Clinton "took so many initiatives he made us think for a while we had elected the first black president."

It strikes me as ironic that according to liberals the first black president was not actually black and the first gay president is not actually gay. In liberal land it isn't necessary to actually be what you are reputed to be if you simply embrace the right ideas. For President Clinton being black meant supporting an agenda approved by the national black leadership. It had nothing to do with skin color and everything to do with ideology.

The same is true for President Obama and his sudden Newsweek anointed gayness. President Obama is no more gay than President Clinton is black. But reality doesn't matter to the Left. Reality isn't real in any meaningful sense. It is only a concept to be twisted until the truth is wringed out of it so that the gatekeepers of politically correct thinking can assign meaning. It all makes me wonder how long it will be before some other left wing publication will declare President Obama to be the first female president.

But for conservatives, reality is attached to the facts as they are in the real world. Concerning President Obama's announcement that his evolution has led him to the revelation that gay is ok the facts are:

1. North Carolina just became the 30th state to pass an amendment to their constitution to define marriage as a union between a man and a woman. North Carolina's amendment goes even farther by banning civil unions. The amendment passed by eleven percent.

2. According to a new USA Today/Gallup survey 40 percent of Americans say President Obama's public support of gay marriage will affect their votes. Of that number, 26% say they are less likely to vote for Obama and just 13% are more likely.

3. The same poll also revealed that among independents, 23% say they are now less likely to vote for Obama.

That poll might mean three strikes and you're out for an Obama second term. South Carolina Congressman and stalwart Obama defender Rep. James Clyburn broke ranks with the President saying his support for same-sex marriage does not go far enough. He thinks the President shouldn't leave something as important as marriage up to individual states. Rep. Clyburn is the No. 3 ranking Democrat in the House behind House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi and Minority Whip Steny Hoyer. In an MSNBC interview Clyburn said, I, like the president has evolved to a point of marriage equality. But he went on to say, "However I depart from the president on the state-by-state approach. If you consider this (marriage) to be a civil right…and I do…. I don’t' think civil rights ought to be left up to a state-by-state approach."

While I certainly don't believe same-sex marriage is a civil right I absolutely agree that it is an issue that is too important to be left up to individual states. The Full Faith and Credit clause of the Constitution would force a state like South Carolina to accept same-sex marriages performed in Massachusetts. That would have the effect of nullifying South Carolina's tenth amendment right to define marriage by allowing another state's definition to take precedent. Complete chaos would be the order of the day.

When President Obama announced his advanced evolved state of enlightenment on same-sex marriage I put a Facebook post of my best E-Trade baby shocked face. Most of the readers got the joke and agreed that the only thing shocking about President Obama's announcement is the his honesty. Let's hope this president doesn't decide to put our country on the line in a prizefight or a poker game. He telegraphs his punches and bluffs with all the subtleness of a charging rhinoceros. His avid support for the repeal of the military's "don't ask, don't tell" policy and his refusal to defend the Defense of Marriage Act drained all of the history out of his "historic" announcement.

In an obvious tip-of-the-hat to the rainbow as a symbol of the LGBT community Newsweek saw fit to grace Obama's head with a rainbow halo. How ironic both the LGBT community and Newsweek would both choose a symbol that harkens back to the ultimate example of God's judgment.

Perinatal Hospice Provides Critical Care for Unborn and Families

Posted: 22 May 2012 03:00 AM PDT

perinatal-hospiceWashington, DC – A new policy paper released yesterday by the Charlotte Lozier Institute (CLI) features Byron Calhoun, M.D., a perinatologist and professor at West Virginia University-Charleston, addressing the subject of care and treatment for unborn children diagnosed with genetic disorders. "The Perinatal Hospice: Allowing Parents to be Parents," the first in-depth paper released by the education and research arm of the pro-life Susan B. Anthony List, offers research on the effects and benefits of perinatal hospice.

"Dr. Calhoun is a pioneer in the recent field of perinatal hospice, which takes principles from end-of-life hospice and applies them to the care of mother, child and family upon diagnosis of a terminal fetal abnormality," said Chuck Donovan, president of the Charlotte Lozier Institute. "Perinatal hospice offers a humane and caring option for parents and their unborn child, rather than just abandoning them to abortion."

Dr. Calhoun's paper for the Lozier Institute is available here.

Last week, Dr. Calhoun testified before the U.S. House Judiciary Committee’s Subcommittee on the Constitution on the subject of perinatal hospice.  The subcommittee examined the current legal regime in the nation's capital that allows abortion, for any reason, up to and beyond viability to the moment of birth.  The subcommittee also heard testimony on proposed legislation to ban abortion in the District of Columbia after the fetus has reached 20 weeks gestation, based on their ability to feel pain at that point. Dr. Calhoun's testimony before the House Judiciary Committee Subcommittee on the Constitution is available here.

The Charlotte Lozier Institute was launched in 2011 as the education and research arm of Susan B. Anthony List. The CLI is a hub for research and public policy analysis on some of the most pressing issues facing the United States and nations around the world. The CLI website features commentaries, reviews and blog posts by an array of policy experts and scholars whose work covers statistics, medicine, bioethics, health care and law.

Catholic Church Agencies File Lawsuits Challenging HHS Contraceptives Mandate

Posted: 21 May 2012 09:45 PM PDT

Obama_Sebelius_laugh-580x340By Tom Chapman

The president of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) released a statement earlier today as 43 dioceses, hospitals, schools and church agencies across the nation filed 12 lawsuits challenging the federal Health and Human Services mandate on contraceptive services. Cardinal Timothy M. Dolan of New York applauded the filings, saying the HHS mandate violates religious freedom.

His statement follows …

"We have tried negotiation with the Administration and legislation with the Congress – and we'll keep at it – but there’s still no fix. Time is running out, and our valuable ministries and fundamental rights hang in the balance, so we have to resort to the courts now. Though the Conference is not a party to the lawsuits, we applaud this courageous action by so many individual dioceses, charities, hospitals and schools across the nation, in coordination with the law firm of Jones Day. It is also a compelling display of the unity of the Church in defense of religious liberty. It’s also a great show of the diversity of the Church’s ministries that serve the common good and that are jeopardized by the mandate – ministries to the poor, the sick, and the uneducated, to people of any faith or no faith at all."

The mandate would require many Catholic and other religious institutions to cover medical services that are in opposition to their religious beliefs. The president’s announced accommodation still makes an unacceptable distinction between houses of worship and their ministries, and still requires all non-exempt employers to facilitate the objectionable coverage.

For news coverage visit www.catholicnews.com.

UPDATED ACTION ALERT ON HHS MANDATE

The National Committee for a Human Life Amendment (NCHLA), affiliated with the U.S. Catholic bishops, has a new action alert on the HHS mandate. A sample message is available at www.nchla.org/actiondisplay.asp?ID=292. Please send a message to HHS about your support for a rule that would allow all organizations and individuals to offer, sponsor and obtain health coverage that does not violate their moral and religious convictions.

The primary focus of the alert is the federal Department of Health and Human Services "Advance notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPRM)" published March 21. HHS is seeking comments on how the final rule for the contraceptive mandate published Feb. 15 can accommodate religious organizations. Unfortunately the ANPRM does not correct the fundamental problems in the mandate. A final rule on the matter of the ANPRM will be issued at a subsequent unspecified date.

The full text of the USCCB's comments on ANPRM is available:www.usccb.org/about/general-counsel/rulemaking/upload/comments-on-advance-notice-of-proposed-rulemaking-on-preventive-services-12-05-15.pdf.

A secondary focus of the alert is legislation. Members of Congress are urged to co-sponsor and promote the passage of the Respect for Rights of Conscience Act (H.R. 1179, S. 1467).

Thanks for all you do in support of this issue.

AND FINALLY,

Dioceses are putting together their plans for the "Fortnight for Freedom," a 14-day period of prayer, education and action in support of religious freedom. It will be held June 21-July 4.

During the Iowa Catholic Conference board meeting last week, Des Moines Bishop Richard Pates announced an "Independence Celebration Walk and Picnic," which will take place as a part of the fortnight on the early afternoon of Sunday, July 1. It will consist of a walk in downtown Des Moines to the state Capitol grounds and will be followed by a picnic. Go to www.dmdiocese.org/religious-liberty.cfm for more information.

Tom Chapman is the Executive Director of the Iowa Catholic Conference

Sweeney Receives Endorsements from State Senators Zaun and Greiner in Iowa House District 50 Primary Race

Posted: 21 May 2012 09:00 PM PDT

Grassley-SweeneyIowa House District 50, which encompasses parts of Butler and Hardin Counties and all of Butler County, has a tight primary matchup between two incumbent Republican State Representatives on June 5th.  State Representative Annette Sweeney (R-Alden) who currently represents House District 44 (which consists of Hardin County and western Marshall County) and State Representative Pat Grassley (R-New Hartford) who currently represents House District 17 (which consists of Butler County and the western half of Bremer County) were placed in the new House District 50 when the map was redrawn.  State Representative Sweeney, who chairs the House Agriculture Committee, received two endorsements from the Iowa Senate.

State Senator Brad Zaun (R-Urbandale) is the Senate Republican Whip and a former Congressional Candidate.  He endorsed Sweeney last week.  He wrote:

Iowans across the state will be heading to the voting booths in less than 3 weeks. We as a state face some very challenging times, and leadership is needed in Des Moines now more than ever. This is why I am writing you today, I have personally seen that leadership by Annette Sweeney.

I began working with Annette in 2009, when she was a freshman Representative and I was in State Senate. At the time Republicans were in the minority, and the Democrats controlled both chambers with sizeable majorities and the Governor’s office. Yet during that time I witnessed Annette Sweeney’s ability to work both parties in each chamber and the governor’s office to pass some very important legislation that helped Iowa veterans apply and receive home loans. That legislation passed the Iowa House 100-0 and the Senate 50-0.

Annette’s leadership and passion for this state is on display everyday when she is in Des Moines, at work in the district or leading a trade mission to South Korea and China. Annette saw an opportunity for Iowans and she took it. That trade mission led to the opening of those markets to Iowa’s farmers and manufactures.

When House Republicans took the majority after the 2010 elections, we saw Annette become Chair of the House Agriculture Committee were she worked to promote rural Iowa and its family farms. She led the way to defend our farmers from some unscrupulous groups and actors. Annette’s bill the Ag Protection Act not only passed both chambers with large bi-partisan support and signed into law; it has been duplicated and passed by 8 other states.

However the most important achievements of Annette Sweeney happened this year. During the budget debates, Annette submitted an amendment that would end state funding for abortions and defend the unborn. This amendment became known as the Sweeney Amendment. Many in the past have tried to take on this challenge and they failed. Yet Annette was the only one in recent memory to have her Pro-Life amendment pass the Iowa House with bi-partisan support and force the Democrats who control the Senate be on record on this extremely important issue.

This is why I am endorsing Representative Annette Sweeney in this primary race. She has demonstrated over her career the leadership, passion and effectiveness that Iowans so desperately need. Annette just isn’t going to Des Moines to pass the time, Annette Sweeney is going to Des Moines to make a difference. Annette wants to make Iowa great again, and with your support we will. I urge you to vote for Annette Sweeney on June 5th for House District 50.

State Senator Sandy Greiner (R-Keota) endorsed Sweeney in an email today.  She wrote:

On Tuesday, June 5th, the people of House District 50 have a clear choice when they vote to re-elect Conservative Republican Annette Sweeney to the Iowa Statehouse.

I am a former member of the Iowa House and current member of the Iowa Senate.  I am also a 5th generation family farmer, wife, mother, grandmother and conservative.  I had the honor of meeting Annette Sweeney in 2008. As you can imagine with similar backgrounds we became great friends, and over the past 4 years Annette has proven herself to be a tireless advocate for Iowa agriculture.

I have worked in public policy and politics for the last 30 years, the last 20 years from the inside.  I have seen legislators with an assortment of styles come and go.  And I can tell you that Annette Sweeney is an uncommon legislator – she stands out because she instinctively knows how to represent her district without making a dozen phone calls around her district to see how she should vote.   Annette is a natural leader.  Her leadership was recognized when she was appointed to Chair the House Agriculture Committee.  

As Chair, Annette has used her position to strengthen family farms in Iowa. Just this year, Annette led the fight to protect family farms to make sure people applying for jobs are real people and not PETA activists. Annette’s bill was called the Ag Protection Act, which passed the House and Senate with bipartisan support and Governor Branstad signed into law.

When Annette isn’t busy representing her constituents, you can find her singing in the church choir, announcing at a cattle show, delivering cookies to farmers at the elevator or out doing chores.  Annette is an outstanding person who never stops working. And that work ethic is the reason she is quite simply an outstanding legislator. 

Annette exemplifies the qualities Iowans expect in their elected officials. Frankly, we could use more people like Annette in the legislature.

I am proud to call her my friend, and I ask you to Vote to re-elect Annette Sweeney to the Iowa Statehouse on June 5th.

It should be noted that State Representative Grassley has a key supporter in his grandfather, U.S. Senator Chuck Grassley (R-IA).

Natural fountains for the relief of poverty

Posted: 21 May 2012 08:19 AM PDT

Thomas Chalmers (1780-1847) was an early voice opposing the compulsory, state-managed poor relief, what would later evolve into the present monster of the welfare state.  He argued that a compulsory, bureaucratized system tended to stop up four natural fountains of charity within society, fountains that had long adequately refreshed the poor in rural Scottish society for ages.  In order, these fountains were (1) personal industry, (2) the kindness of personal relatives, (3) the sympathy of the wealthy, and (4) the sympathy of the poor for each other.  Unstop these by eliminating the compulsory system, and in general, poverty is naturally relieved.  A few words from Chalmers himself on each, from his Collected Works, Vol. 14:

(1) Natural fountain # 1: personal industry.

“We know not a more urgent principle of our constitution than self-preservation; and it is a principle which not only shrinks from present suffering, but which looks onward to futurity, and holds up a defence against the apprehended wants and difficulties of the years that are to come.  Were the great reservoir of public charity, for the town at large, to be shut, there would soon be struck out many family reservoirs, fed by the thrift and sobriety, whichnecessity would then stimulate, but which now the system of pauperism so long has superseded;—and from these there would emanate a more copious supply than is at present ministered out of poor rates, to aliment the evening of plebeian life, and to equalise all the vicissitudes of its history” (402).

(2) Natural fountain # 2: the kindness of personal relatives.

“One of the most palpable, and at the same time most grievous effects of this artificial system, is the dissolution which it has made of the ties and feelings of relationship. It is this which gives rise to the melancholy list of runaway parents, wherewith whole columns of the provincial newspapers of England are oftentimes filled. And then, as if in retaliation, there is the cruel abandonment of parents, by their own offspring, to the cold and reluctant hand of public charity. In some cases, there may not be the requisite ability; but the actual expense on the part of labourers, for luxuries that might be dispensed with, demonstrates that, in most cases, there is that ability. But it is altogether the effeet of pauperism to deaden the inclination. It has poisoned the strongest affections of nature; and turned inwardly, towards the indulgences of an absorhent selfishness, that stream which else would have flowed out on the needy of our own blood and our own kindred. It has shut those many avenues of domestic kindliness by which, but for its deadening and disturbing influence, a far better and more copious circulation of needful supplies would have been kept up throughout the mass of society” (402-403).

(3) Natural fountain # 3: the sympathy of the wealthy.

By the state-managed system, the result is that the wealthy and the poor “stand to each other in a grim array of hostility—the one thankless and dissatisfied, and stoutly challenging as its due, what the other reluctantly yields, and that as sparingly as possible. . . Were this economy simply broken up, and the fountain of human sympathy again left free to be operated upon by its wonted excitements, and to send out its wonted streams throughout those manifold subordinations by which the various classes of society and bound and amalgamated together – we doubt not that from this alone a more abundant, or, at least, a far more efficient and better-spread tide of charity would be diffused throughout the habitations of indigence” (404-405)

(4) Natural fountain # 4: the sympathy of the poor for each other.

“In the veriest depths of unmixed and extended plebeianism, and where, for many streets together, not one house is to be seen which indicates more than the rank of a common labourer, are there feelings of mutual kindness, and capabilities of mutual aid, that greatly outstrip the conceptions of a hurried and superficial observer: And, but for pauperism, which has released immediate neighbours from the feeling they would otherwise have had, that in truth the most important benefactors of the poor are the poor themselves— there has been a busy internal operation of charity in these crowded lanes, and densely peopled recesses, that would have proved a more effectual guarantee against the starvation of any individual, than ever can be reared by any of the artifices of human policy” (405).

* * *

Originally posted at West Port Experiment.

Niciun comentariu:

Trimiteți un comentariu